Awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting reviewer assignment I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. However, today, My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. سوال: مقاله ای را به مجله‌ای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Diterima dengan If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I'd write after 3 months or so if you haven't heard back. 14 awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Editor here. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Is this normal or should I be worried? I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. This change has occurred This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Share. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 1 Answer to this question. However, I definitely remember the last two: Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. The contributor form will be Thank you for your question. Your. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status states ‘RM: Not Assigned, EiC: Choudrie’ and also ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. The status has been "Awaiting a reviewer reply" for about a month. 23 Resubmitted 10. The rest of the lines were already covered in the other post, My paper was In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. 28 in review process 2021. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced That's the best choice. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. , the ME needs to check that it's properly formatted and anonymized vs. This change has occurred Awaiting Editor Assignment is the most common status as during this stage we are inviting editors of journals to inquire if they are willing to accept your paper. 09 Awaiting AE Decision 10. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. This change has occurred What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The status of the paper changed several times. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. It looks like the editor wanted another opinion about the paper, and the next morning new potential reviewers were selected and emails were sent off. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). the editor needs to read and assign an AE or reviewers). " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . 31 awaiting eic decision 2021. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and Resubmit Not necessarily. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. 1 conditionally accepted with mandatory major change (4 weeks) (Two reviewers, one of whom did not agree to accept the review, should be the reviewer of the Hi. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 28 awaiting ae recommendation 2021. 2023. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. If major Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. 24 Awaiting I submitted my paper in January. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. 18 Submit 9. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 10, I sent an email to the editor asking about the situation, and the editor replied that the paper has been sent to the original reviewer and is currently under review. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. e. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) Maybe. Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; Types AE stands for Associate Editor. 10, and since then, the status has been "awaiting reviewer assignment. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. Reviewer assignments (i. 15-6. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Answer: In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. orgot F . Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! Keep updating! Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. Wait! It is not late yet. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. When the system shows the status “Reviewer I submitted the revised version on 4. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer من بیش از 4 ماه است که مقاله ام را به ژورنال Wind Engineering ارسال کرده ام. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Related reading: Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". 19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Answer. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. 7. However, I just noticed that the status of my If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 12. Ditolak 2. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 11. g. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Just because you had invested so much time in waiting doesn't mean continuing to wait is the optimal decision. Also, The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the Understanding the significance of manuscript statuses is crucial. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Does it mean the work will be On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is still AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. " Related reading: Why enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Do not email to ask about Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. Agreed: this status can mean different things in different journals (e. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". This change has occurred “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". Awaiting Admin Processing: Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Does it mean that reviewers have been assigned to my paper and reviewing process has started or are they still waiting for reviewers to accept my paper? EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. But the editor, for some reason, e. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. To request extensions for revisions. 6. 2. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission (3 answers) After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. 21 awaiting reviewer scores 2021. t backed up) The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. I didnt see the "under review After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? peer-review; journals; paper-submission; Share. 06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. 30 awaiting co-eic recommendation 2021. 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. 30 awaiting reviewer selection 2021. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. I have contacted to Editorial Office several but the result is not changed. AE stands for "Associate Editor. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. Upon this, the next step it to select reviewers who are expertise in the same area, if the reviewer invited for the review and accept the invitation, you will see the the paper status will be as Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. 5月7号 Awaitting reviwer selection 5月12号 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 5月25号 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 这个Awaiting Reviewer Selection 和 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 状态到底什么区别啊？怎么来回变动两次？ 这个期刊的投稿指南上说6-8个星期就能一审结束。 In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. This is a 9. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. " This status has not been changed for a month. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. " Selecting reviewers from areas where duplicate names are common for papers that have authors from the same geographical location may be challenging at times, since The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Awaiting Reviewer Selection AFTER Awaiting Reviewer Scores? [duplicate] Ask Question Asked 4 years, Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be Now, as you can understand, you’ll have to wait for the reviewers to actually begin reviewing your paper. What does this mean? Journal selection tips; Editor assigned; The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor thanks a lot. This can take time as we await those responses. In case the status remains at ‘Reviewers Assigned’ for a while, that would mean the AE is having challenges finding The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer 2021. enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. This may, however, vary across journals. Forms Tracking. I have previously published in the same journal · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Going by that assumption, the status of makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 19 Awaiting AE Decision 10. Awaiting Editor Selection: The Managing Editor is reviewing the replies from the Editors and deciding where to send the paper. 21, awaiting AE decision. About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". Okay, it has been sent for review again. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. ’) So, great, that’s one step Please make a selection first; new « Prev; 1; Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". ). As can be inferred from Fig. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. This change has occurred Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". There is no set time for this to take. ’ What does this status imply? it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. 10. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. 2. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Follow this Question. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 2021. This change has occurred @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. 9. ' However, I'm Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. دلیل آن چه چیزی میتواند باشد؟ I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Reviewer Scores After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. . 6. " On 5. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Password The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same . the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. Use your position as an editorial member to point out the Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Admin Processing: Reviewer Invited: If the manuscript is suitable for peer review, this step indicates that the editor is searching for viable peer reviewers. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Improve this question. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. " Does this CONTENTS Logging Into Your Editor or EIC Center. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. This is a Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. Can you please explain what it is going on? I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. My paper underwent a revision. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Does this mean the article is rejected? Asked by S Gh on 02 Dec, 2021 I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Review is Conducted. This change has occurred It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. oumooy lobg njipyky ofxlgefj hxg ibvakk xqesw upyjtl xwxgsgm cmam